<![CDATA[Dispel magic]]>i think that dispel magic needs to be changed because it is still the only good spell for pk, we ethier need to lower the power of sanc and higher armor resistance.. or change the way dispel magic, dispels spells.. like only dispels 1 spell in pvp or something, im not sure… lemme know what you think

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/108/dispel-magicRSS for NodeWed, 15 Apr 2026 23:39:34 GMTTue, 13 Apr 2004 17:24:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:22:02 GMT]]>It's just too easy to hit someone with a full dispel, or close. I cast it once all their shit is gone in one go. That is too easy.

And Arkain as to that quote, I mean for PVP battles only, not mobs. Mob dispelling is fine as it is.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1945https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1945Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:22:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:04:16 GMT]]>Am I the only one that feels that level shouldn't matter when it comes to spells? Only spell resistance! (Which would mean we need a Spell Resitance meter or something) .02

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1938https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1938Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:04:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:10:03 GMT]]><quote author="Inimical">@Inimical:

I don't think there should be a spell by spell breakdown of which is more or less vulnerable to being dispelled. The level of the affect, the level of the dispel magic, and whatever save mods there are (unsure what these may be, i'd imagine racial magic resistance and spell shield would play a part though) should probably be sufficient.</quote>
It would be overkill I think… and pretty good guess inimical - those are pretty much the things it depends on.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1916https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1916Thu, 15 Apr 2004 04:10:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:49:48 GMT]]>I don't think there should be a spell by spell breakdown of which is more or less vulnerable to being dispelled. The level of the affect, the level of the dispel magic, and whatever save mods there are (unsure what these may be, i'd imagine racial magic resistance and spell shield would play a part though) should probably be sufficient.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1895https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1895Wed, 14 Apr 2004 03:49:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:53:41 GMT]]><quote author="Belexus">@Belexus:

I think each spell has to have a sort of vulnerability to dispel magic, and sanctuary and other important, powerfull spells like that can have a higher resistance to it, also maybe have a cap on the max affects dispelled at once, like maybe 3 or 4.</quote>

then dispeling high lvl mobs would be almost impossible

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1893https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1893Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:53:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:05:53 GMT]]>I think each spell has to have a sort of vulnerability to dispel magic, and sanctuary and other important, powerfull spells like that can have a higher resistance to it, also maybe have a cap on the max affects dispelled at once, like maybe 3 or 4.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1892https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1892Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:05:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:55:14 GMT]]>Also agree.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1885https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1885Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:55:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Dispel magic on Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:29:18 GMT]]>Totally agree. Tone down sanc and fix dispel so it doesnt hit almost every affect you have.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1882https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/1882Tue, 13 Apr 2004 20:29:18 GMT