<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Marriage Benefits]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Proposed benefits of ingame marriage.</p>
<p dir="auto">We already have the shared housing. I would propose the folllowing</p>
<p dir="auto">Spousethink(abbrevieated ST): channel between spouses, I know u can alias them but a seperate channel that has truesight mebbe and works even asleep etc would be nice.</p>
<p dir="auto">SpouseGoto: would instantly teleport u to your spouse , cross-zone restrictiions apply. And maybe even pk room restrictiions, but had this on mud I played during Sents long down period and was a nice thing to have.</p>
<p dir="auto">Would like to hear all thoughts on these or any other possible benefits.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/199/marriage-benefits</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:56:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/199.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:53:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marriage Benefits on Wed, 03 Nov 2004 06:03:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">&lt;quote author="inimical"&gt;<s><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/inimical" aria-label="Profile: inimical">@<bdi>inimical</bdi></a>:</s></p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Even in a safe room it's abusable. The world is small enough already, and there are plenty of cheap pk tricks to be played without adding a new breed.&lt;/quote&gt;</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Hrmm, I wouldnt say abuse , I would say use of a benefit of saying I do. What spouse would not come running to help there loved one. With the cross-zone limitations, I dont think that it should be an overpowering benefit, and maybe even adding a line in Score saying Married to: So&amp;So . So that if you are thinking of attacking someone you can do a whois and a who to see if they have a spouse and if that spouse is logged and capabale of a spousegoto from where they are at.</p>
<p dir="auto">2vs1 pk fights happen all the time.</p>
<p dir="auto">As long as you arent married to an alt of yourself then spouse goto during a pk fight should just be a benefit not an abuse. IMHO. But even if spouse goto was limited to non-pk rooms then that would prevent it from affecting pk that much accept to prevent the attack from ever happening, just as if the spouse had come by any other means.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2668</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[RedRaven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2004 06:03:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marriage Benefits on Tue, 02 Nov 2004 20:17:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Even in a safe room it's abusable. The world is small enough already, and there are plenty of cheap pk tricks to be played without adding a new breed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[inimical]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 20:17:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Marriage Benefits on Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:48:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">having a spouse-only channel is redundant. there are so many other ways to communicate, and tell is the best option.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, I do like the idea of going to and from your spouse, only if they are in a safe room. Otherwise, it's very abusable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2657</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/2657</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mythology]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:48:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>