<![CDATA[IDeas for DRagons]]>i have an idea about a mount command for Dragons that would allow players under your formation to mount the Dragon player as per normal mount only the Dragon has the lead and takes the player with them

make it non abusable by adding a Mount commond that can turn off getting mounted as a dragon

Syntax Mount turns it on or off weather you can be mounted

the Dragon must be a formation leader and once he/she is mounted by a player he leads them around as per Forming only the players moves and actions are that of being mounted…

Also the dragon can type unmount at any time (or not within 5 rooms of PK) and knock the person off of thier back

just an idea

-Darkavian

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/307/ideas-for-dragonsRSS for NodeWed, 15 Apr 2026 21:35:13 GMTTue, 06 Sep 2005 03:17:41 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:35:59 GMT]]>Emtae, riding Darkavian, is nearby to the east.

Darkavian, mounted by Emtae, is nearby to the east.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3514https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3514Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:35:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:39:46 GMT]]>KinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnKEE

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3510https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3510Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:39:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:57:03 GMT]]>very good point, i agree with that

you could make the message something like

HEY Darkavian's been Mounted east of here.

HEY Emtae's mounting Darkavian east of here.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3508https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3508Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:57:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:03:43 GMT]]>So do I. And as far as looking in a room and seeing it, something like…

Darkavian with his funky title is here, being ridden by Emtae.

Emtae with his title is here, riding Darkavian.

That way it still shows both players, and not partially masking one

Emtae with his funky title is here, riding Darkavian.

People look at the first line and would see Emtae, but completely miss Darkavian figuring it's Emtae's pmount. I could see people abusing this and say, Baelwolf mounting RPB (being a 120 remort), using Baelwolf almost as bait to bring someone in to cpk him and have RPB be there and unseen.

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3505https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3505Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:03:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:48:01 GMT]]>Aye, good idea, I say go for it

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3503https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3503Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:48:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:25:27 GMT]]>the no mount option was my orriginal idea, and also make it so the person has to be under a formation of the dragon, so if the dragon walks them into CPK and kills them if thier idle the same no leading form into CPK rules apply

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3501https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3501Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:25:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:22:39 GMT]]>Well, this most likely isn't a good idea, but having the ability to jump on the dragons back in combat in some sort of move or just mount command would be some what humorus.

On the, who moves when mounted, it should be the dragon, only because someone could mount the dragon, when they are idle, and then take them to cpk, and kill them. How ever, having no mount option would fix that, kinda like nosum

Emtae

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3500https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3500Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:22:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:22:06 GMT]]>the person mounting the Dragon doesnt have control, the Dragon has control, as he is the one carting the other one around, also i dont see a problem with what Myth was saying about limiting the Dragons abilities as well, i mean it cant be easy to circle with someone on your back

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3499https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3499Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:22:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:15:43 GMT]]>I don't agree with the player mounting the dragon player having full control. However, I do agree with it working with mounted combat, and the dragon pc only being able to use breaths and some form of unarmed attack (bite, claw, tail, etc).

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3498https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3498Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:15:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to IDeas for DRagons on Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:46:58 GMT]]>You know, that could be a really funny idea. However, the power of the two together could be insanly cheap. However, it could be a good idea, when comparing a crusader, formed with another player when mounted. So go for it I say.

Emtae

]]>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3496https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/3496Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:46:58 GMT