<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Who&#x2F;Channel Visibility]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Seen this come up a couple times with regards to deathsight, but would make sense overall - Why not have who and channels ignore every form of invis except for wizi/incog. This would make helping newbies much easier, while still retaining the utility of invis (not showing up on where or in the room without proper detects).</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/612/who-channel-visibility</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:29:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/topic/612.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:01:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Who&#x2F;Channel Visibility on Tue, 27 Sep 2016 06:38:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Created &lt;bug bug="74"&gt;~~[bug=74]~~Issue #74[/bug]&lt;/bug&gt; to handle this.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/4254</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.v2.sentiencemud.net/post/4254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tieryo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 06:38:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>