NodeBB

For making it not just a vuln against vamps, what about my idea above about being able to use it in combat, against anyone, as stabbing them with a stake with very small percentage chance of death, much higher chance of just jabbing them? I also like the idea of it being used against lesser vampires - old blood being so much more powerful, and old vampires having experience and strength from so many years, young vampires it makes sense to be vulnerable, even with trained up stats. Would be a very cool skill to have if an area was created as a vampire area.. a crypt or something, not just the one little place under Reza, but a town or at least a large area. For RP value that'd be nice, since right now vampires (not counting players!) are sort of an afterthought in the game's set up - their areas, RP equipment and mobs play a very minor role. Rat mobs play a larger RP value than the total of vampire stuff. Just a thought :) Heh, forgive me if it's not totally coherent, I'm sick again and on lots of cold medicine…. and back to bed with me.

Awesome Syn - I want a tattoo too :twisted: I mean think about it.. you think Warlord, doesn't that image come with some sort of badass accessories - tattoos, scary hair, intimidation tactics.. a big part of war is looking fierce - and a terrified enemy won't be as effective in combat. To be fair though, so far the conversation has really been trying to shift to remort only. I was thinking more of new things that could go for mort or remort classes. A warpaint or tattoo skill would fit really well in a couple of the mort classes too, but maybe then not be very effective against remorts for balance. Maybe you could make tattoos from quest items. Like quest for a vial of tattoo ink, then travel to a specific location for the type of tattoo you want.. like if you want a dragon tattoo with fly spell, travel to Kalandor where a new mob will give you a tattoo based on the town's famous dragon.

Avatar looks great Stareve! Now I just have to steal… erm "get" an avatar of my own. :lol:

Warlords, male or female, should be called Warlords. Witches, male or female, should be called Witches. Especially taking into consideration that even in wiccan religeon, males are referred to as witches as there are no warlocks :)

<quote author="Ithilidin">@Ithilidin: Isn't that what the ring of truesight does?</quote> Ring of TrueSight only shows if in same room as the shifted/shaped person. <quote>> Aren't we the egomaniac. If I was complaining about just that PK, i'd have taken it to the whining board.</quote> Just interesting that the post was here so quickly afterwards. Probably while you were still dead from affore mentioned pk. And I guess my point is this Stareve, I wasnt in the area you were in when you entered pk. So shaped or not I would not have shown on who or where for that area. The point is this, you knowingly entered a pk area, that shows readily that you are there. And you should know by now, that I or anyone with proper means can get there very quickly. Being as how I was shaped as a non-resident mob of the area, when I walked in the room you should have had a clue. It not the skills/eq/natural sneakiness I have but your apparent in attention to what was going on in the area while you were busy with a mob. NOT while you were making the assessment of risk of going in. You knew (or should have known) the room you were in was less than 10 steps from the door to the hall of my church. You knew I was active (or should have since you saw me at the mayor several times.) To change the where now to show shape/shifted characters would negate the reason for those abilitties. I say leave as is. And yes I am one with these abilities, but as is well known, I also have to characters that dont, so when on these characters, I dont enjoy that benefit, but yet they still get there fair share of action, and plan on getting more. And they also risk not knowing where a shifted/shaped char might be when going into pk areas. So this is not a totally biased opinion.

Very nice.